4.7 Article

The circular RNA circNlgn mediates doxorubicin-induced cardiac remodeling and fibrosis

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 175-189

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.03.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT-153105, PJT-155962, PJT-166107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doxorubicin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic medication for cancer treatment, but it has severe side effects. Research has shown that silencing the circular RNA circNlgn can reduce the damaging effects of doxorubicin on the heart, potentially mitigating its side effects.
Doxorubicin is a chemotherapeutic medication commonly used to treat many types of cancers, but it has side effects including vomiting, rash, hair loss, and bone marrow suppression. The most dangerous side effects are cardiomyopathy, cardiofibrosis, and heart failure, as doxorubicin generates cytotoxicity and stops DNA replication. There is no treatment to block these side effects. We have developed a transgenic mouse line overexpressing the circular RNA circNlgn and shown that circNlgn is a mediator of doxorubicin-induced cardiofibrosis. Increased expression of circNlgn decreased cardiac function and induced cardiofibrosis by upregulating Gadd45b, Sema4C, and RAD50 and activating p38 and pJNK in circNlgn transgenic heart. Silencing circNlgn decreased the effects of doxorubicin on cardiac cell activities and prevented doxorubicin-induced expression of fibrosis-associated molecules. The protein (Nlgn173) translated by circNlgn could bind and activate H2AX, producing gH2AX, resulting in upregulation of IL-1b, IL-2Rb, IL-6, EGR1, and EGR3. We showed that silencing these molecules in the signaling pathway prevented doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, increased cardiomyocyte viability, decreased cardiac fibroblast proliferation, and inhibited collagen production. This mechanism may hold therapeutic implications for mitigating the side effects of doxorubicin therapy in cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据