4.2 Article

Efficacy of the granisetron transdermal system for the control of nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 406-+

出版社

KOREAN ASSOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2020.359

关键词

Drug therapy; Antiemetics; Granisetron; Nausea; Vomiting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the efficacy of the granisetron transdermal system (GTS) with ondansetron for controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The results showed that GTS was not inferior to ondansetron in controlling CINV, and it also improved the quality of life in patients.
Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy of the granisetron transdermal system (GTS) with that of ondansetron for controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients treated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: We randomized a total of 389 patients to groups treated by GTS and ondansetron before HEC. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR; no retching/vomiting/rescue medication) of CINV from the time of chemotherapy initiation to 24 hours after the last administration of chemotherapy (prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15%). Quality of life (QoL) was also assessed using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Results: The per protocol analysis included 152 (47.80%) and 166 patients (52.20%) in the GTS and ondansetron groups, respectively. In the full analysis set, the most common diagnosis, regimen, and period of chemotherapy were lung cancer (149 patients, 40.27%), cisplatin-based regimen (297 patients, 80.27%), and 1 day chemotherapy (221 patients, 59.73%). The CR rates were 86.84% and 90.36% in the GTS and ondansetron groups, respectively; the treatment difference was -3.52% (95% confidence interval, -10.52 to 3.48) and met the primary endpoint, indicating that GTS was not inferior to ondansetron. Patient satisfaction, assessed on the FLIE, showed significantly higher scores in the GTS group compared to the ondansetron group (mean +/- standard deviation, 1,547.38 +/- 306.00 and 1,494.07 +/- 312.05 mm, respectively; p = 0.0449). Conclusions: GTS provided effective, safe, and well-tolerated control of CINV and improved the QoL in HEC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据