4.7 Article

Management of surgical mask waste to activated carbons for CO2 capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101970

关键词

Activated carbons; Surgical mask waste; Polymer management; COVID-19, CO2 adsorption

资金

  1. Agata Markowska-Szczupak

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study has developed an efficient method of converting waste face masks into useful carbon materials and using them for CO2 adsorption. The prepared activated carbon showed high adsorption capacity and selectivity for CO2. This research provides an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way of recycling waste face masks.
The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a huge amount of face masks being used up and thrown away, resulting in increased environmental pollution and infection risks. In our work, we have developed a highly efficient process of neutralizing face mask waste into a useful carbon material. Then, the prepared activated carbon was used for CO2 adsorption studies. A series of activated carbons from face masks used as a precursor were synthesized using KOH and the activation temperature was in the range of 600-800 degrees C. All materials were characterized by well-developed porosity. The influence of activation temperature on the textural properties of prepared activated carbons and their adsorption abilities were investigated. The highest CO2 adsorption was received for the M_800 carbon and it was 3.91 mmol/g at the temperature of 0 degrees C and the pressure of 1 bar. M_800 carbon exhibited also high selectivity of CO2 over N-2. Seven equilibrium isotherms were applied to the experimental data to find out the best fit (Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips, Toth, Unilan, FritzSchlunder and Radke-Prausnitz isotherms). The presented research provides an environmentally friendly and cost-effective method of recycling waste masks into a valuable product in the form of carbon and its potential use in the absorption of harmful CO2 influencing the greenhouse effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据