4.6 Article

Genetic Analysis of Novel Behaviour Traits in Pigs Derived from Social Network Analysis

期刊

GENES
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13040561

关键词

social network analysis; genetic parameters; welfare; aggressiveness; pigs

资金

  1. BBSRC through the Roslin Institute 2021 Flexible Talent Mobility Award (FTMA)
  2. BBSRC Institute Strategic Program [BBS/E/D/30002275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social network analysis (SNA) provides new insights into the role of individual pigs in aggression. This study finds that SNA traits are heritable and strongly genetically correlated with skin lesion traits. A combination of eigenvector centrality and clustering coefficient may help reduce skin lesions.
Social network analysis (SNA) has provided novel traits that describe the role of individual pigs in aggression. The objectives were to (1) estimate the genetic parameters for these SNA traits, (2) quantify the genetic association between SNA and skin lesion traits, and (3) investigate the possible response to selection for SNA traits on skin lesion traits. Pigs were video recorded for 24 h post-mixing. The observed fight and bullying behaviour of each animal was used as input for the SNA. Skin lesions were counted on different body parts at 24 h (SL24h) and 3 weeks (SL3wk) post-mixing. A Bayesian approach estimated the genetic parameters of SNA traits and their association with skin lesions. SNA traits were heritable (h(2) = 0.09 to 0.26) and strongly genetically correlated (rg > 0.88). Positive genetic correlations were observed between all SNA traits and anterior SL24h, except for clustering coefficient. Our results suggest that selection for an index that combines the eigenvector centrality and clustering coefficient could potentially decrease SL24h and SL3wk compared to selection for each trait separately. This study provides a first step towards potential integration of SNA traits into a multi-trait selection index for improving pigs' welfare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据