4.6 Article

Taste Receptor Cells Generate Oscillating Receptor Potentials by Activating G Protein-Coupled Taste Receptors

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.883372

关键词

oscillation; receptor potentials; action potentials; in situ perforated patch clamping; fungiform taste bud cells

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21K06270]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K06270] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that taste receptor cells generate oscillating depolarization in response to different taste substances, and these oscillations may be linked to the activation of ATP-permeable ion channels.
The receptor potentials of taste receptor cells remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that taste receptor cells generate oscillating depolarization (n = 7) with action potentials in response to sweet, bitter, umami, and salty taste substances. At a lower concentration of taste substances, taste receptor cells exhibited oscillations in membrane potentials with a low frequency and small magnitude of depolarization. Although the respective waves contained no or 1-2 action potentials, the taste receptor cells generated action potentials continuously in the presence of taste stimuli. Both the frequency and magnitude of oscillations increased when the concentration was increased, to 0.67-1.43 Hz (n = 3) and Delta 39-53 mV (n = 3) in magnitude from -64.7 +/- 4.2 to -18.7 +/- 5.9 mV, which may activate the ATP-permeable ion channels. In contrast, a sour tastant (10-mM HCl) induced membrane depolarization (Delta 19.4 +/- 9.5 mV, n = 4) with action potentials in type III taste receptor cells. Interestingly, NaCl (1 M) taste stimuli induced oscillation (n = 2) or depolarization (Delta 10.5 +/- 5.7 mV at the tonic component, n = 9). Our results indicate that the frequency and magnitude of oscillations increased with increasing taste substance concentrations. These parameters may contribute to the expression of taste thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据