4.7 Review

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.845689

关键词

anaphylaxis; clinical practice guideline; epinephrine; emergency management; severity grading system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This guideline provides high-quality and evidence-based recommendations for the emergency management of anaphylaxis, including diagnosis, preparation, emergency treatment, and post-emergency management. The use of the NIAD/FAAN diagnostic criteria and the four-tier grading system, along with prompt and proper administration of epinephrine, are the key recommendations.
Background: For anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction, the incidence rate was presented to have increased from the beginning of the 21st century. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of anaphylaxis are public health concerns.Objective: This guideline aimed to provide high-quality and evidence-based recommendations for the emergency management of anaphylaxis.Method: The panel of health professionals from fifteen medical areas selected twenty-five clinical questions and formulated the recommendations with the supervision of four methodologists. We collected evidence by conducting systematic literature retrieval and using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.Results: This guideline made twenty-five recommendations that covered the diagnosis, preparation, emergency treatment, and post-emergency management of anaphylaxis. We recommended the use of a set of adapted diagnostic criteria from the American National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (NIAID/FAAN), and developed a severity grading system that classified anaphylaxis into four grades. We recommended epinephrine as the first-line treatment, with specific doses and routes of administration for different severity of anaphylaxis or different conditions. Proper dosage is critical in the administration of epinephrine, and the monitor is important in the IV administration. Though there was only very low or low-quality evidence supported the use of glucocorticoids and H1 antagonists, we still weakly recommended them as second-line medications. We could not make a well-directed recommendation regarding premedication for preventing anaphylaxis since it is difficult to weigh the concerns and potential effects.Conclusion: For the emergency management of anaphylaxis we conclude that:center dot NIAID/FAAN diagnostic criteria and the four-tier grading system should be used for the diagnosis center dot Prompt and proper administration of epinephrine is critical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据