4.7 Article

LPM3770277, a Potent Novel CDK4/6 Degrader, Exerts Antitumor Effect Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.853993

关键词

triple-negative breast cancer; CDK4; 6 degrader; hydrophobic tagging; proteasome; lysosome-promoted autophagy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a CDK4/6 degrader against TNBC using hydrophobic tagging technology and demonstrated its efficacy and safety through in vitro and in vivo experiments. This suggests the potential of using hydrophobic tags as a strategy to treat TNBC.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with significant malignancy and poor prognosis but effective treatments are limited. Given the critical role of CDK4/6 in cell cycle and the apparent success of CDK4/6 inhibitors against certain cancer, this study attempted to utilize hydrophobic tagging technology to develop a CDK4/6 degrader against TNBC. We based on the chemical structure of the major metabolite of a clinically approved CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, to synthesize three compounds and evaluated their in vitro cytotoxicity. LPM3770277 stood out as the most promising compound which was further confirmed by a series of binding and CDK4/6 degradation studies. LPM3770277 was able to bind to CDK4/6, and time-dependently and dose-dependently increased CDK4/6 protein degradation. Mechanistic study revealed that LPM3770277 exerted its CDK4/6 degradation effect via two machineries: proteasome and lysosome-promoted autophagy. Using in vivo TNBC xenograft cancer model, we found that LPM3770277 demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy and safety as compared to abemaciclib, although both compounds exerted similar effects on cell cycle arrest. In conclusion, this study for the first time developed and characterized a CDK4/6 degrader against TNBC using hydrophobic tags, which strongly suggests the viability of hydrophobic tags as a strategy to develop potential treatments against TNBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据