Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of a Doravirine-Based, Three-Drug Regimen in Treatment-Naive HIV-1 Positive Adults: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Extensive use of antiretroviral therapy has remarkably improved the survival rates of people living with HIV. Doravirine (DOR) is a newly-approved antiretroviral belonging to the class of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of DOR + tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate (TDF)+Lamivudine (3TC)/Emtritabine (FTC) with traditional triple therapies in treatment-naive HIV-1-positive adults. Methods: Randomized controlled trials involving treatment-naive HIV-1-positive adults that met inclusion criteria were systematically retrieved and data on the following outcomes extracted: virological suppression, adverse events, severe adverse events, and drug-related adverse events. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was then performed on the data. Results: This study included a total of 39 randomized controlled trials involving 26 antiretroviral therapies and 21,110 HIV1-positive patients. At week 48, relative to the other 25 regimens included in the network of virological suppression, DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC exhibited superiority to some efavirenz, nevirapine, atazanavir, or lopinavir-based regimens, including efavirenz + abacavir+3TC [Odd Ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CrI) = 0.35-0.77]. At week 48, the performance of DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC was relatively similar to all other analyzed regimens in terms of adverse events. The DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC regimen performed better in terms of severe adverse events and drug-related adverse events. Conclusion: The network meta-analysis showed that DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC has good efficacy and safety at 48 weeks.

Automated summary

This study compares the efficacy and safety of DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC with traditional triple therapies in treatment-naive HIV-1-positive adults. The results showed that at 48 weeks, DOR + TDF+3TC/FTC exhibited superior virological suppression compared to some other regimens, while being similar in terms of adverse events. The regimen also performed better in terms of severe adverse events and drug-related adverse events.