4.6 Article

Alpha Oscillations in Parietal and Parietooccipital Explaining How Boredom Matters Prospective Memory

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.789031

关键词

electroencephalography; boredom; prospective memory; parietooccipital; parietal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71942005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between boredom and prospective memory, and finds that parietal oscillations and parietooccipital oscillations mediate this relationship. The default mode network and visual processing during boredom are also found to be related to prospective memory. These findings suggest the importance of attention management and visual information processing in coping with boredom.
Intelligent interaction alters previous human-machine task allocation patterns. Human workers will suffer from boredom and inattention, posing a significant challenge for the human-machine interaction loop. This study aims to investigate the relationship between boredom and prospective memory, which is a memory form including the detecting, identifying, and executing functions. Thus, the attention and memory mechanisms are critical to complete prospective memory tasks when bored. This study recruited twenty-eight participants and used electroencephalography to measure the alpha power in brain regions. The results indicated that parietal oscillations had a mediation effect on prospective memory, which could be associated with the frequent unstable attention. In addition, this study found that parietooccipital oscillations linked boredom and prospective memory, and the default mode network (DMN) and visual processing during boredom could better explain this finding. The findings of this study suggested that attention management and influences of processing visual information were starting points to cope with boredom because they could help prepare for prospective memory and make optimal decisions accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据