4.6 Article

CHIP Decline Is Associated With Isoflurane-Induced Neurodegeneration in Aged Mice

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.824871

关键词

PND; isoflurane; neurodegeneration; CHIP; synaptic function

资金

  1. China National Key RD program [2020YFC2009002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders commonly occur in elderly patients, and isoflurane could be a risk factor. This study found that the ubiquitin-proteasome system and aging may play a role in the pathogenesis of these disorders.
Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) commonly occur in elderly patients, and isoflurane could be a risk factor. During the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) participates in the process of aging, which affects synaptic plasticity and synaptic function. However, whether UPS is involved in the etiology of PND is unclear. In this study, we examined the expression change of ubiquitin E3 ligase protein carboxyl-terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP) and the function turbulence of UPS in isoflurane-exposed aged mouse to illustrate the role of UPS in PND. Neurodegenerative behavioral changes were shown in isoflurane-exposed aged mice and correlated with neuropathological changes manifested with reduced number of intersections and spine density in the cortex. Ubiquitin function was decreased while the apoptosis was activated, and CHIP protein expression decline altered synapsin expression and phosphorylation associated with the neurodegeneration in isoflurane-induced PND. Aging was the big important factor. And it remained consistent with the synapsin phosphorylation/dephosphorylation level changes in CHIP knock-down N2a cells. Per our observation, the decline in CHIP protein expression and synaptic degeneration might reveal the reason for synaptic degeneration in the underlying pathogenesis of PND caused by isoflurane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据