Training Willpower: Reducing Costs and Valuing Effort

The integrative model of effortful control presented in a previous article aimed to specify the neurophysiological bases of mental effort. This model assumes that effort reflects three different inter-related aspects of the same adaptive function. First, a mechanism anchored in the salience network that makes decisions about the effort that should be engaged in the current task in view of costs and benefits associated with the achievement of the task goal. Second, a top-down control signal generated by the mechanism of effort that modulates neuronal activity in brain regions involved in the current task to filter pertinent information. Third, a feeling that emerges in awareness during effortful tasks and reflects the costs associated with goal-directed behavior. The aim of the present article is to complete this model by proposing that the capacity to exert effortful control can be improved through training programs. Two main questions relative to this possible strengthening of willpower are addressed in this paper. The first question concerns the existence of empirical evidence that supports gains in effortful control capacity through training. We conducted a review of 63 meta-analyses that shows training programs are effective in improving performance in effortful tasks tapping executive functions and/or self-control with a small to large effect size. Moreover, physical and mindfulness exercises could be two promising training methods that would deserve to be included in training programs aiming to strengthen willpower. The second question concerns the neural mechanisms that could explain these gains in effortful control capacity. Two plausible brain mechanisms are proposed: (1) a decrease in effort costs combined with a greater efficiency of brain regions involved in the task and (2) an increase in the value of effort through operant conditioning in the context of high effort and high reward. The first mechanism supports the hypothesis of a strengthening of the capacity to exert effortful control whereas the second mechanism supports the hypothesis of an increase in the motivation to exert this control. In the last part of the article, we made several recommendations to improve the effectiveness of interventional studies aiming to train this adaptive function. Keep the faculty of effort alive in you by a little gratuitous exercise every day. James (1918, p. 127)& nbsp;

Automated summary

The article presents the integrative model of effortful control, aiming to specify the neurophysiological bases of mental effort. It suggests that effort reflects three inter-related aspects: decision-making in task engagement, top-down control signal modulating neuronal activity, and the feeling of costs associated with goal-directed behavior. The article also proposes that effortful control capacity can be improved through training programs, supported by empirical evidence from meta-analyses. The neural mechanisms explaining these gains in effortful control are discussed, including decreased effort costs and increased value of effort through operant conditioning. Recommendations to improve intervention studies focusing on training effortful control are provided.