4.3 Article

Evinacumab for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 139-145

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2047934

关键词

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; angiopoietin-like 3; homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; evinacumab; hypertriglyceridemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the pharmacological characteristics, clinical evidence, and safety of evinacumab, an ANGPTL3 inhibitor. Phase 3 clinical trials showed that evinacumab can significantly reduce LDL-C levels in patients with HoFH, making it a potential valuable treatment option.
Introduction Hypercholesterolemia is mainly caused by abnormal lipoprotein metabolism and can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) can increase low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipids by inhibiting lipoprotein lipase activity. Evinacumab is a monoclonal antibody against ANGPTL3, it can decrease levels of LDL-C and has shown potential benefit in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Areas covered A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed (January 2000 to August 2021). Key search terms included ANGPTL3, evinacumab and HoFH. Other sources were derived from product labeling and ClinicalTrials.gov. All English-language articles identified from the data sources were reviewed and evaluated. Phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials were included. The pharmacological characteristics, clinical evidence, and safety of evinacumab were reviewed. Expert opinion Evinacumab is an ANGPTL3 inhibitor. Phase 3 clinical trials found that in patients with HoFH, evinacumab reduced LDL-C by 47%, but placebo increased by 2%. Evinacumab was well-tolerated. Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, influenza-like illness, dizziness, rhinorrhea, and nausea. It has the potential to become a valuable treatment option for patients with HoFH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据