4.6 Article

Synthesis and Photoelectrocatalytic Applications of TiO2/ZnO/Diatomite Composites

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12030268

关键词

titanium dioxide; zinc oxide; diatomite; volatile organic compounds; catalytic degradation; photocatalysis; photoelectrocatalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, TiO2/ZnO/diatomite composites with low recombination rate and strong UV-visible absorption properties were successfully prepared. The composite catalyst showed good photocatalytic degradation ability for both liquid pollutants and harmful volatile gases, and also exhibited good photoresponsivity and electrolytic efficiency in the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions.
ZnO and TiO2 are semiconductor nanomaterials that are widely used in photocatalysis. However, the relatively high recombination rate and low quantum yield of photogenerated electron-hole pairs limit their practical applications. In this study, a series of TiO2/ZnO/diatomite composites with various compositions were successfully prepared via a two-step precipitation method. They exhibited stronger UV-visible absorption properties and substantially lower fluorescence intensities than those of ZnO and ZnO/diatomite, which was mainly due to the low recombination rate of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs in the composite system. The reaction intermediates of methylene blue were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the degradation process was determined. The best composite catalyst was used for the degradation of gaseous methylbenzene and gaseous acetone. The gaseous acetone degradation product was determined to be acetaldehyde via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results show that the composite catalyst exhibited a good photocatalytic degradation of both liquid pollutants and harmful volatile gases. When applied to the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions, the composite catalyst retained a good photoresponsivity and electrolytic efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据