4.6 Article

Ibrutinib as monotherapy versus combination therapy in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: A multicenter study

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 4134-4145

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4765

关键词

combination therapy; ibrutinib; mantle cell lymphoma; relapsed; refractory

类别

资金

  1. Special Support Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center [PT19020401]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China [202002030205]
  3. Clinical Oncology Foundation of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology [Y-XD2019-124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 121 Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who received either ibrutinib monotherapy or ibrutinib-based combination therapy. The results showed that ibrutinib combination therapy had potentially superior efficacy and comparable tolerability to ibrutinib monotherapy. Ibrutinib-based combination therapy could be one of the prominent treatment options for relapsed/refractory MCL patients.
Background Ibrutinib has revolutionized the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Both ibrutinib monotherapy and ibrutinib-based combination therapy are important salvage options for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. The real-world efficacy and safety profile of the two strategies in Chinese patients with R/R MCL remain unclarified. Methods In the present study, data of 121 R/R MCL patients who received either ibrutinib monotherapy (N = 68) or ibrutinib combination therapy (N = 53) in 13 medical centers in China were retrospectively reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 20.5 months, the overall response rate was 60.3% versus 84.9% (p = 0.003), complete remission rate was 16.2% versus 43.4% (p < 0.001), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1-21.8) vs. 30.8 months (95% CI, 23.5-NR) (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.93]; p = 0.025), with ibrutinib monotherapy and ibrutinib-based combination therapy, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with male gender, no refractory disease, Ki67 <30%, previous line of therapy = 1, non-blastoid subtype, and the number of extranodal sites involved <2 might benefits more from the combination therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar, except for a higher incidence of all grade neutropenia in the ibrutinib combination group (12.7% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.017). Conclusions Ibrutinib combination therapy demonstrated potentially superior efficacy and comparable tolerability to ibrutinib monotherapy. Ibrutinib-based combination therapy could be one of the prominent treatment options for R/R MCL patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据