4.3 Article

Missing data imputation for transfer passenger flow identified from in-station WiFi systems

期刊

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 325-342

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2064935

关键词

WiFi data; missing data; transfer flow; multitask Gaussian process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new perspective for in-station transfer flow estimation using data collected by a WiFi sensor system. The proposed method is critical for path choice modeling and pedestrian management. It utilizes a 'seed matrix' constructed based on the identification of inter-platform transfer activities to estimate the full in-station transfer flow. The main challenge is handling the missing elements in the 'seed matrix' caused by sensor failures. The proposed self-measuring multi-task Gaussian process (SM-MTGP) framework addresses this problem by capturing the heterogeneous correlations in temporal features.
This paper presents a new perspective for in-station transfer flow estimation, utilising data collected by WiFi sensor system, which is critical for path choice modelling and pedestrian management. The full in-station transfer flow can be estimated by scaling up a 'seed matrix', which is constructed based on the identification of inter-platform transfer activities. Due to sensor failures, the main problem comes from handling the missing elements in the constructed 'seed matrix'. We address this problem with a novel kernel-based framework, named self-measuring multi-task Gaussian process (SM-MTGP). The heterogeneous correlations in temporal features are captured by the designed task-based and input-based kernels separately. Moreover, a self-measuring kernel is designed for learning the correlations carried by the observations. The performance of the proposed method is validated with data from a busy railway station. The results show that the proposed algorithm achieves the best imputation accuracy in both accuracy and robustness, especially at high missing rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据