4.0 Article

The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data

期刊

THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 492-500

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00386-0

关键词

Bayesian predictive inference; Non-proportional hazards; Patient-centric measure; Rank preservation; Survival gain; Time-to-event endpoint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a patient-centric and tangible measure of clinical benefit, which goes beyond traditional statistical measures and facilitates communication among clinicians, patients, and other parties.
Background The call for patient-focused drug development is loud and clear, as expressed in the twenty-first Century Cures Act and in recent guidelines and initiatives of regulatory agencies. Among the factors contributing to modernized drug development and improved health-care activities are easily interpretable measures of clinical benefit. In addition, special care is needed for cancer trials with time-to-event endpoints if the treatment effect is not constant over time. Objective To quantify the potential clinical survival benefit for a new patient, would he/she be treated with the test or control treatment. Methods We propose the predictive individual effect which is a patient-centric and tangible measure of clinical benefit under a wide variety of scenarios. It can be obtained by standard predictive calculations under a rank preservation assumption that has been used previously in trials with treatment switching. Results We discuss four recent Oncology trials that cover situations with proportional as well as non-proportional hazards (delayed treatment effect or crossing of survival curves). It is shown that the predictive individual effect offers valuable insights beyond p-values, estimates of hazard ratios or differences in median survival. Conclusion Compared to standard statistical measures, the predictive individual effect is a direct, easily interpretable measure of clinical benefit. It facilitates communication among clinicians, patients, and other parties and should therefore be considered in addition to standard statistical results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据