4.6 Review

Bibliometric Analysis of Data Sources and Tools for Shoreline Change Analysis and Detection

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14094895

关键词

shoreline change; coastal erosion; sea level rise; remote sensing; Landsat; machine learning; GIS; climate change

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia)-FCT [2021.05220.BD]
  2. Centre of Studies in Geography and Spatial Planning (CEGOT) - Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UIDB/04084/2020]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [2021.05220.BD] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is a bibliometric analysis of global scientific production on shoreline change analysis and detection. The results show that the USA has the highest scientific production in this field. Geospatial tools and machine learning are becoming increasingly important in shoreline change analysis. The study identifies some research gaps that have not yet been addressed.
The world has a long record of shoreline and related erosion problems due to the impacts of climate change/variability in sea level rise. This has made coastal systems and large inland water environments vulnerable, thereby activating research concern globally. This study is a bibliometric analysis of the global scientific production of data sources and tools for shoreline change analysis and detection. The bibliometric mapping method (bibliometric R and VOSviewer package) was utilized to analyze 1578 scientific documents (1968-2022) retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. There is a chance that in the selection process one or more important scientific papers might be omitted due to the selection criteria. Thus, there could be a bias in the present results due to the search criteria here employed. The results revealed that the U.S.A. is the country with the most scientific production (16.9%) on the subject. Again, more country collaborations exist among the developed countries compared with the developing countries. The results further revealed that tools for shoreline change analysis have changed from a simple beach transect (0.1%) to the utilization of geospatial tools such as DSAS (14.6%), ArcGIS/ArcMap (13.8%), and, currently, machine learning (5.1%). Considering the benefits of these geospatial tools, and machine learning in particular, more utilization is essential to the continuous growth of the field. Found research gaps were mostly addressed by the researchers themselves or addressed in other studies, while others have still not been addressed, especially the ones emerged from the recent work. For instance, the one on insights for reef restoration projects focused on erosion mitigation and designing artificial reefs in microtidal sandy beaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据