4.6 Article

The Relevance of the Circular Economy for Climate Change: An Exploration through the Theory of Change Approach

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14073991

关键词

circular economy; climate change; theory of change (ToC); eco-innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of the relevance of the circular economy for climate change through the theory of change approach framework. Analysis of 96 articles revealed that 87% of the reviewed articles showed a strong relevance of the circular economy for climate change. However, most of the articles focused on the mitigation aspect of climate change. The circular economy is widely practised in countries such as the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, and China. The main theoretical contribution of this study is developing a logical framework through the theory of change approach, which is a novel method in social science research apart from monitoring and evaluation studies.
The relevance of the circular economy for climate change is still a developing area of research that needs to be explored. This paper aims to provide an overview of the relevance of the circular economy for climate change through the theory of change approach framework. For this purpose, we analysed 96 articles from the Scopus and WoS databases in the Arts and Humanities, Business, Management and Accounting, Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Social Sciences, with the keywords Circular economy and Climate Change. Our analysis shows that 87% of the reviewed articles showed a strong relevance of the circular economy for climate change. However, most of the articles focused on the mitigation aspect of climate change. The circular economy is widely practised in countries such as the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, and China. Our main theoretical contribution is in developing a logical framework through the theory of change, which is a novel approach in social science research apart from monitoring and evaluation studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据