4.4 Article

Lithium-free processing of silk fibroin

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 450-463

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0885328216653259

关键词

Silk fibroin; Ajisawa's reagent; urea; gradient dialysis; lithium bromide

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51273138, 81301844]
  2. Soochow University [14317432]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Suzhou City Jiangsu Province China [SYN201403]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silk fibroin protein was purified from Bombyx mori silkworm cocoons using a novel dialysis strategy to avoid fibroin aggregation and pre-mature formation of -sheets. The degummed silk fibers were dissolved in Ajisawa's reagent, a mixture of CaCl2-EtOH-H2O, that is less expensive than lithium bromide. The dissolved solutions were dialyzed against either water or urea solution with a stepwise decrease in concentration. When the steps of 4 M-2 M-1 M-0 M urea (referred to as silk-TS-4210) were adopted, the purified silk fibroin had smaller aggregates (<10nm), similar average molecular weight (225kDa) and a lower content of -sheet (approximate to 15%) compared to the sample processing methods (silk-TS-210, 10, 0) studied here. This outcome was close to the fibroin purified by the lithium bromide (silk-Li-0) method. Polyvinyl alcohol-emulsified silk microspheres generated using the purified solution had a similar size distribution and morphology when compared to lithium bromide dissolved solutions, while glycerol-blended silk films showed different mechanical properties. The silk-Li-0 generated films with the highest breaking strength (5.7MPa +/- 0.3) while the silk-TS-4210 had the highest extension at break (215.1%+/- 12.5). The films prepared from silk-TS-4210 were cytocompatible to support the adhesion and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells, with improvements compared to the other samples likely due to the porous morphology of these films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据