4.6 Article

Decentralized Processing Performance of Fruit and Vegetable Waste Discarded from Retail, Using an Automated Thermophilic Composting Technology

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14052835

关键词

food waste; composting system; organic waste management; decentralized composting

资金

  1. Romanian Minister of Research [POC/78/1/2/, SMIS2014 + 136213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food waste generation is causing significant issues worldwide and research is being conducted on a novel composting technology to address these challenges. By analyzing retail-store waste, the difficulties of waste management and the characteristics of discarded waste were identified. The proposed composting technology showed high efficiency in removing pathogens and seeds, reducing waste mass by 88%, and effectively processing food.
Food waste generation is increasing at an exponential rate, affecting the environment, food security, and causing major economic issues worldwide. The main aim of the current research is to investigate a novel composting technology that is still in its early stages of development. The proposed composting technology combining thermophilic composting with the use of advanced automated processing reactors. Starting from a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the waste generated at retail-stores, the most significant difficulties associated to waste management as well as the main characteristics of the discarded waste were identified. The findings allowed to design and evaluate the real operating performance of an automated thermophilic composting prototype (working in a decentralized regime), with the goal of delivering a faster processing system, improving operational efficiency, reducing expenses, and lowering environmental impacts. The proposed operating technique showed a high capacity for pathogens and seeds removal, the waste input mass reduction of 88%, and efficiency in food processing (2235 kg of fruits and vegetables in a 14-days timeframe).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据