4.6 Article

Mining-Related Metal Pollution and Ecological Risk Factors in South-Eastern Georgia

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14095621

关键词

soil pollution; mining; heavy metals; ecological risk; particulate matter

资金

  1. Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia [DO/187/150/14, PHDF-21-1718]
  2. Heinrich Boll Stiftung
  3. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold and copper production are crucial for the Georgian economy, but the mining activities take place in important agricultural areas. This study assessed the water and soil quality in the region, revealing an increase in heavy metal concentrations and highlighting high ecological risks in some villages.
Gold and copper production is important to the Georgian economy, but at the same time, mineral resources are mined in one of the important agricultural areas of the country. This study evaluated water and soil quality in the region. Soil from 18 villages was analyzed. Some of these villages have not been investigated before and previous information about soil quality was unknown. Ecological risk factors and potential ecological risk were determined for the study area. Atomic absorption spectrometry was used to analyze heavy metals concentration in soil and water samples taken from the study area. Integrated water and soil data allowed us to see how these important natural resources influence each other. After the comparison of the four-year period of the study, we observed an increase of heavy metals increase in the soil in 2017 compared to 2014. Higher lead concentration was discovered within a two kilometer radius of the mining area whereas the highest cadmium concentration was observed in the village Ratevani, 15 km away from the nearest mine, where there was an extremely high ecological risk of Cd concentration. Further investigations are recommended to be done in Ratevani village as the people living in this village are at risk of Cd poisoning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据