4.8 Article

Synergic use of two-dimensional materials to tailor interfaces in large area perovskite modules

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107019

关键词

Perovskite-based photovoltaic; Perovskite solar cells; Two-dimensional (2D) materials; Interface engineering; Large area perovskite modules

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [SGA 881603 GrapheneCore3]
  2. MISSION INNOVATION project of Italian MISE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the field of halide perovskite solar cells, interface engineering has been used to improve solar cell performance. In this study, the use of multi two-dimensional materials as intra and inter layers in mesoscopic PSCs has led to a significant boost in efficiency. The 2D materials-based structure has also been successfully extended to large area devices.
In the field of halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs), interface engineering has been conceptualized and exploited as a powerful mean to improve solar cell performance, stability, and scalability. In this regard, here we propose the use of a multi two-dimensional (2D) materials as intra and inter layers in a mesoscopic PSCs. By combining graphene into both compact and mesoporous TiO2, Ti3C2Tx MXenes into the perovskite absorbing layer and functionalized-MoS2 at the interface between perovskite and the hole transporting layer, we boost the efficiency of PSCs (i.e., +10%) compared to the 2D materials-free PSCs. The optimized 2D materials-based structure has been successfully extended from lab-scale cell dimensions to large area module on 121 cm2 substrates (11 x11 cm2) till to 210 cm2 substrates (14.5 x14.5 cm2) with active area efficiency of 17.2% and 14.7%, respectively. The remarkable results are supported by a systematic statistical analysis, testifying the effectiveness of 2D materials interface engineering also on large area devices, extending the 2D materials-perovskite photovoltaic technology to the industrial exploitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据