4.6 Review

Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory (CBRAM): Challenges and Opportunities for Memory and Neuromorphic Computing Applications

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13050725

关键词

CBRAM; RRAM; memristor; emerging memory technologies; neuromorphic computing; artificial synapses; artificial neurons

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education [MOE-T2EP50120-0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid increase in data volume, there is a growing need for new memory technologies and computing systems. CBRAM, as an emerging technology, offers great opportunities for future memory and neuromorphic computing applications. This review thoroughly explores the principles, applications, challenges, and simulations of biological synapses and neurons using CBRAM devices fabricated with various materials and device engineering approaches.
Due to a rapid increase in the amount of data, there is a huge demand for the development of new memory technologies as well as emerging computing systems for high-density memory storage and efficient computing. As the conventional transistor-based storage devices and computing systems are approaching their scaling and technical limits, extensive research on emerging technologies is becoming more and more important. Among other emerging technologies, CBRAM offers excellent opportunities for future memory and neuromorphic computing applications. The principles of the CBRAM are explored in depth in this review, including the materials and issues associated with various materials, as well as the basic switching mechanisms. Furthermore, the opportunities that CBRAMs provide for memory and brain-inspired neuromorphic computing applications, as well as the challenges that CBRAMs confront in those applications, are thoroughly discussed. The emulation of biological synapses and neurons using CBRAM devices fabricated with various switching materials and device engineering and material innovation approaches are examined in depth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据