4.6 Article

High-Production-Rate Fabrication of Low-Loss Lithium Niobate Electro-Optic Modulators Using Photolithography Assisted Chemo-Mechanical Etching (PLACE)

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13030378

关键词

lithium niobate; electro-optic modulator; insertion loss; photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0705000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12192251, 12004116, 12104159, 11874154, 11734009, 11933005, 12134001, 61991444]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [21DZ1101500]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2019SHZDZX01]
  5. Shanghai Sailing Program [21YF1410400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the design and fabrication of a high-performance thin-film lithium niobate electro-optic modulator using photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching technology. The modulator exhibits a wide bandwidth, low insertion loss, and low half wave voltage-length product, making it suitable for the development of large-scale low-loss photonic integrated devices.
Integrated thin-film lithium niobate (LN) electro-optic (EO) modulators of broad bandwidth, low insertion loss, low cost and high production rate are essential elements in contemporary interconnection industries and disruptive applications. Here, we demonstrated the design and fabrication of a high performance thin-film LN EO modulator using photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE) technology. Our device shows a 3-dB bandwidth over 50 GHz, along with a comparable low half wave voltage-length product of 2.16 Vcm and a fiber-to-fiber insertion loss of 2.6 dB. The PLACE technology supports large footprint, high fabrication uniformity, competitive production rate and extreme low device optical loss simultaneously, our result shows promising potential for developing high-performance large-scale low-loss photonic integrated devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据