4.7 Review

Two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks: from synthesis to bioapplications

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01395-9

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Two-dimensional materials; Diagnostic; Biosensing; Cancer treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52103169, 31900990, 51973214]
  2. Nantong Municipal Science and Technology Project [JCZ19090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review article highlights the unique structural properties of ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets and their advantages in technological applications. It summarizes the design strategies and fabrication methods, and presents the recent advancements in the bioapplications of two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks and future opportunities.
As a typical class of crystalline porous materials, metal-organic framework possesses unique features including versatile functionality, structural and compositional tunability. After being reduced to two-dimension, ultrathin metalorganic framework layers possess more external excellent properties favoring various technological applications. In this review article, the unique structural properties of the ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets benefiting from the planar topography were highlighted, involving light transmittance, and electrical conductivity. Moreover, the design strategy and versatile fabrication methodology were summarized covering discussions on their applicability and accessibility, especially for porphyritic metal-organic framework nanosheet. The current achievements in the bioapplications of two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks were presented comprising biocatalysis, biosensor, and theranostic, with an emphasis on reactive oxygen species-based nanomedicine for oncology treatment. Furthermore, current challenges confronting the utilization of two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks and future opportunities in emerging research frontiers were presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据