4.4 Article

D-instanton superpotential in string theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2022)054

关键词

F-Theory; Flux Compactifications; String and Brane Phenomenology; Superstring Vacua

资金

  1. Pappalardo Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the non-perturbative superpotential generated by D(-1)-branes on Calabi-Yau threefold hypersurfaces in type IIB compactifications on orientifolds. By computing the Picard-Fuchs equations in the global Sen-limit, it is shown that the elliptic Calabi-Yau fourfolds do not contain exponentially suppressed terms. This implies that the superpotential of the underlying type IIB compactification in the global Sen-limit does not receive D(-1)-instanton contributions.
We study the non-perturbative superpotential generated by D(-1)-branes in type IIB compactifications on orientifolds of Calabi-Yau threefold hypersurfaces. To compute the D-instanton superpotential, we study F-theory compactification on toric complete intersection elliptic Calabi-Yau fourfolds. We take the Sen-limit, but with finite g(s), in F-theory compactifications with the restriction that all D7-branes are carrying SO(8) gauge groups, which we call the global Sen-limit. In the global Sen-limit, the axio-dilaton is not varying in the compactification manifold. We compute the Picard-Fuchs equations of elliptic Calabi-Yau fourfolds in the global Sen-limit, and show that the Picard-Fuchs equations of the elliptic fourfolds split into that of the underlying Calabi-Yau threefolds and of the elliptic fiber. We then demonstrate that this splitting property of the Picard-Fuchs equation implies that the fourform period of the elliptic Calabi-Yau fourfolds in the global Sen-limit does not contain exponentially suppressed terms O(e())(-pi/gs). With this result, we finally show that in the global Sen-limit, the superpotential of the underlying type IIB compactification does not receive D(-1)-instanton contributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据