4.6 Article

Loss of α-Tubulin Acetylation Is Associated with TGF-β-induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 291, 期 10, 页码 5396-5405

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.713123

关键词

acetylation; epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT); histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6); microtubule; transforming growth factor (TGF-beta)

资金

  1. Key Program of the Ministry of Sciences and Technology [2012CB966600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91540205, 31571447, 31401196]
  3. Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31090360]
  4. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2014T70571]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. National Institutes of Health [R01GM63773, R01AR053591, R01CA108454, R01DK073932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process by which differentiated epithelial cells reprogram gene expression, lose their junctions and polarity, reorganize their cytoskeleton, increase cell motility and assume a mesenchymal morphology. Despite the critical functions of the microtubule (MT) in cytoskeletal organization, how it participates in EMT induction and maintenance remains poorly understood. Here we report that acetylated -tubulin, which plays an important role in microtubule (MT) stabilization and cell morphology, can serve as a novel regulator and marker of EMT. A high level of acetylated -tubulin was correlated with epithelial morphology and it profoundly decreased during TGF--induced EMT. We found that TGF- increased the activity of HDAC6, a major deacetylase of -tubulin, without affecting its expression levels. Treatment with HDAC6 inhibitor tubacin or TGF- type I receptor inhibitor SB431542 restored the level of acetylated -tubulin and consequently blocked EMT. Our results demonstrate that acetylated -tubulin can serve as a marker of EMT and that HDAC6 represents an important regulator during EMT process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据