4.7 Article

Minimal Number of Sensor Nodes for Distributed Kalman Filtering

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3034732

关键词

Observability; Kalman filters; Stability criteria; Task analysis; Gold; Time-varying systems; Laser stability; Distributed Kalman filtering; minimal nodes uniform observability (MNUO); sensor networks; time-varying systems

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1096780, DP160103567]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the problem of finding and identifying the minimal number of sensor nodes for a sensor network. It first proposes a minimal nodes uniform observability condition and applies it to the stability issues of the distributed Kalman filtering algorithm. Results about the relation of filtering performance before and after selecting the minimal number of sensor nodes are obtained. Finally, optimization solutions and an example are given to find the minimal number of sensor nodes for a sensor network.
Finding and identifying the minimal number of sensor nodes for a sensor network is one of the most basic problems for the implementation of distributed state estimators. Despite a plethora of research studied sensor networks, most of them ignored this problem or assumed the considered sensor network comes with an ideal number of sensor nodes. We revisit this problem in the current paper. To this end, the minimal number of sensor nodes problem is first formalized and a novel observability condition, namely, minimal nodes uniform observability (MNUO), is then proposed. Next, this MNUO is applied to study the stability issues of the distributed Kalman filtering algorithm. In what follows, under the condition of MNUO, conditions to ensure its stability are given and the results about the relation of the filtering performance before and after selecting the minimal number of sensor nodes are obtained. Finally, optimization solutions and an example are given to find the minimal number of sensor nodes for a sensor network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据