4.6 Article

Semisupervised Laplace-Regularized Multimodality Metric Learning

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 2955-2967

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3022277

关键词

Measurement; Task analysis; Kernel; Dimensionality reduction; Symmetric matrices; Cybernetics; Laplace regularized; metric learning; multimodal; semisupervised

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62006147, 61925602, 61732011, 61976184, 61876103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a semi-supervised Laplace-regularized multimodal metric-learning method, which explores a joint formulation of multiple metrics and weights to learn appropriate distances from multimodal and high-dimensional features.
Distance metric learning, which aims at learning an appropriate metric from data automatically, plays a crucial role in the fields of pattern recognition and information retrieval. A tremendous amount of work has been devoted to metric learning in recent years, but much of the work is basically designed for training a linear and global metric with labeled samples. When data are represented with multimodal and high-dimensional features and only limited supervision information is available, these approaches are inevitably confronted with a series of critical problems: 1) naive concatenation of feature vectors can cause the curse of dimensionality in learning metrics and 2) ignorance of utilizing massive unlabeled data may lead to overfitting. To mitigate this deficiency, we develop a semisupervised Laplace-regularized multimodal metric-learning method in this work, which explores a joint formulation of multiple metrics as well as weights for learning appropriate distances: 1) it learns a global optimal distance metric on each feature space and 2) it searches the optimal combination weights of multiple features. Experimental results demonstrate both the effectiveness and efficiency of our method on retrieval and classification tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据