4.6 Article

Comprehensive Analysis System for Automated Respiratory Cycle Segmentation and Crackle Peak Detection

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3123353

关键词

Lung; Motion artifacts; Noise reduction; Annotations; Deep learning; Training; Noise measurement; Algorithm design and analysis; biomedical coustics; machine learning; medicine; signal processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a comprehensive signal analysis method for analyzing challenging recordings of crackles, which performs well and exhibits high accuracy in crackle detection. By utilizing a combination of new methods and robustness-focused improvements, the system can assist clinicians in better understanding respiratory sounds non-invasively to differentiate between different types of crackles.
Digital auscultation is a well-known method for assessing lung sounds, but remains a subjective process in typical practice, relying on the human interpretation. Several methods have been presented for detecting or analyzing crackles but are limited in their real-world application because few have been integrated into comprehensive systems or validated on non-ideal data. This work details a complete signal analysis methodology for analyzing crackles in challenging recordings. The procedure comprises five sequential processing blocks: (1) motion artifact detection, (2) deep learning denoising network, (3) respiratory cycle segmentation, (4) separation of discontinuous adventitious sounds from vesicular sounds, and (5) crackle peak detection. This system uses a collection of new methods and robustness-focused improvements on previous methods to analyze respiratory cycles and crackles therein. To validate the accuracy, the system is tested on a database of 1000 simulated lung sounds with varying levels of motion artifacts, ambient noise, cycle lengths and crackle intensities, in which ground truths are exactly known. The system performs with average F-score of 91.07% for detecting motion artifacts and 94.43% for respiratory cycle extraction, and an overall F-score of 94.08% for detecting the locations of individual crackles. The process also successfully detects healthy recordings. Preliminary validation is also presented on a small set of 20 patient recordings, for which the system performs comparably. These methods provide quantifiable analysis of respiratory sounds to enable clinicians to distinguish between types of crackles, their timing within the respiratory cycle, and the level of occurrence. Crackles are one of the most common abnormal lung sounds, presenting in multiple cardiorespiratory diseases. These features will contribute to a better understanding of disease severity and progression in an objective, simple and non-invasive way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据