4.7 Article

Modulation of Wheat Yield Components in Response to Management Intensification to Reduce Yield Gaps

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.772232

关键词

intensive management; Triticum aestivum L; crop density; fungicide; fertility; biomass; kernels m(-2); kernel weight

资金

  1. Kansas Wheat Commission [00-3394]
  2. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Kansas Cooperative Extension Service
  4. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) [2020-68013-30905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Appropriate genotype selection and management can impact wheat yield in dryland environments, and the number of kernels per unit area and aboveground biomass are the most important yield modulators. Foliar fungicides can improve wheat yield, but reduced canopy cover and intercepted radiation can limit it. Ecological intensification and increased plant productivity are important strategies for future increases in wheat yield.
Appropriate genotype selection and management can impact wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in dryland environments, but their impact on yield components and their role in yield modulation are not well understood. Our objectives were to evaluate the yield response of commercial winter wheat genotypes to different management practices reflecting a stepwise increase in management intensity (including a reduction in crop density under high input), and to quantify how the different yield components modulate wheat yield. A factorial experiment evaluated six management (M) intensities [farmer practice (FP), enhanced fertility (EF), ecological intensification (EI), increased foliar protection (IFP), water-limited yield (Yw), and increased plant productivity (IPP)] and four winter wheat genotypes (G) in four Kansas environments (E). Average grain yield was 4.9 Mg ha(-1) and ranged from 2.0 to 7.4 Mg ha(-1), with significant two-way interactions (E x M and E x G). The EF usually maximized yields in dry environments, while EI, which consisted of EF plus one fungicide application, maximized yields in environments with greater water availability. Across all sources of variation, kernels m(-2) and aboveground biomass were the strongest modulators of yield as compared to kernel weight and harvest index, while spikes m(-2) and kernels spike(-1) modulated yields at a similar magnitude. Foliar fungicides improved yield through increased green canopy cover duration and greater radiation intercepted during grain filling. When crop density was reduced from 2.7 to 1.1 million plants per hectare in an otherwise high-input system, plants produced more productive tillers (with genotype-specific response); however, reduced green canopy cover at anthesis and reduced cumulative solar radiation intercepted during grain filling limited wheat yield-although large differences in canopy cover or intercepted radiation were needed to cause modest changes in yield. Treatments more intensive than EI were not warranted as EF or EI maximized yields at all environments, and practices that promote biomass and kernels m(-2) are to be targeted for future increases in wheat yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据