4.8 Article

Microtubule rescue at midzone edges promotes overlap stability and prevents spindle collapse during anaphase B

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72630

关键词

microtubule dynamics; anaphase; spindle; microtubule sliding; modelling; live cell imaging; S; pombe

类别

资金

  1. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [675737]
  2. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  3. Institut National Du Cancer
  4. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  5. La Ligue Contre le Cancer - Ile de France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the researchers investigated the coordination of microtubule growth and sliding during anaphase B. They found that promoting rescues at the midzone edges facilitates the coordination, making microtubules stable from pole to midzone. This constant length of the midzone enables sustained sliding without the need for precise regulation of microtubule growth speed.
During anaphase B, molecular motors slide interpolar microtubules to elongate the mitotic spindle, contributing to the separation of chromosomes. However, sliding of antiparallel microtubules reduces their overlap, which may lead to spindle breakage, unless microtubules grow to compensate sliding. How sliding and growth are coordinated is still poorly understood. In this study, we have used the fission yeast S. pombe to measure microtubule dynamics during anaphase B. We report that the coordination of microtubule growth and sliding relies on promoting rescues at the midzone edges. This makes microtubules stable from pole to midzone, while their distal parts including the plus ends alternate between assembly and disassembly. Consequently, the midzone keeps a constant length throughout anaphase, enabling sustained sliding without the need for a precise regulation of microtubule growth speed. Additionally, we found that in S. pombe, which undergoes closed mitosis, microtubule growth speed decreases when the nuclear membrane wraps around the spindle midzone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据