4.6 Article

Water-Based Fabrication of a Li|Li7La3Zr2O12 |LiFePO4 Solid-State Battery-Toward Green Battery Production

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 7613-7624

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c01349

关键词

solid-state Li battery; sustainable processing; aqueous tape-casting; LFP; garnet LLZO; PEO

资金

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Innovation, Digitalization and Energy of the State North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany [313-W044B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) are highly anticipated due to their high capacity and intrinsic safety. This study presents a sustainable, water-based processing route for garnet-supported SSLBs and successfully fabricates high capacity and cycling stability. Further optimization is needed for higher requirements.
Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) are considered to be one of the most promising next-generation Li batteries due to their high capacity and intrinsic safety. However, their sustainable processing is often poorly investigated but could offer additional advantages over conventional batteries in terms of ecological and economic benefits. In this work, a sustainable, water-based processing route for garnet-supported SSLBs featuring a LiFePO4 (LFP)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) composite cathode is presented. Both the LFP-PEO cathode and the thin free-standing garnet separator (105 mu m) are fabricated by water-based tapecasting. After optimizing the composition of the cathode, the full cell with a thin cathode (similar to 45 mu m) delivers a high capacity of 136 mAh g(-1) with a high Coulombic efficiency over 99% and good cycling stability for 50 cycles. However, the performance and cycling stability decrease when thicker cathodes (similar to 110 mu m) and higher rates were applied, indicating the need for further optimization. Nevertheless, the here-presented water-based fabrication route provides a baseline for further improvements and pushes SSLB fabrication further toward a green battery production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据