4.1 Article

Impact of Urbanization and Expansion of Forest Investment to Mitigate CO2 Emissions in China

期刊

WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 681-696

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0101.1

关键词

Social Science; Ecology; Asia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forests are crucial for controlling climate change, but China's economic development has negatively affected forest habitats. The study shows that forest investment and proper management can reduce carbon emissions and lower carbon levels in neighboring provinces.
Forests are considered the key factor in controlling climate change and extreme climatic events due to their natural role in carbon abatement. However, twenty-first-century economic development is characterized by intensive resource exploitation, energy intensity, population, and urbanization, and hence it is affecting the natural forest habitat. The persistent deforestation and land degradation with limited sustainable forest management and its related services have long-term effects on environmental sustainability. Here, we investigate the impact of forest and its related services on the past decade of China's carbon emissions while accounting for economic development, urbanization, and fossil fuels. We use several spatial techniques to ascertain the carbon abatement effect of the forestry-driven economy in halting the ecological degradation process. We report that carbon emissions decline across 30 provinces in China through the expansion of forest investment and forest management activities}instead of increasing the forest land without continuous proper management. Besides, the spatial analysis confirms that forest investments and proper management contribute to reducing carbon levels in neighboring provinces. From a policy point of view, it is more than an urgent need for the Chinese government to conduct forest management reforms, and such policies might be helpful to generate new sources of employment and pollution reduction in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据