4.6 Article

Sustainable Restoration as a Tool for the Improvement of Water Quality in a Shallow, Hypertrophic Lake

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14071005

关键词

restoration; lake; phosphorus inactivation; nitrogen; phytoplankton; zooplankton

资金

  1. Zaniemyl Municipality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study implemented sustainable restoration treatments in Raczynskie Lake by using phosphorus inactivation with magnesium chloride and Phoslock(R) as well as biomanipulation to improve water quality. The results showed that water quality improved in the first year of treatment, but deteriorated slightly in the second year, highlighting the need for time and monitoring to achieve sustainable restoration.
Sustainable restoration treatments were implemented with the simultaneous application of pro-ecological methods that complement each other to improve water quality in the shallow and heavily polluted Raczynskie Lake. Phosphorus inactivation with magnesium chloride and Phoslock(R) was introduced along with biomanipulation. Physico-chemical and biological parameters were studied in 2015 (before restoration) and throughout 2018 and 2019 (during restoration). Water quality improved in the first year of treatment. An increase in water transparency, oxygen concentration above the bottom, a decrease of chlorophyll-a concentration and a reduction in cyanobacteria were observed. In the second year of treatment, a slight deterioration of water quality was recorded, probably caused by fewer phosphorus inactivation treatments and a shortened period of application. However, the deterioration of conditions is also characteristic of sustainable restoration at the beginning of the restoration process. The obtained results showed that sustainable restoration requires more than two years, and its scope and intensity should strictly depend on the pace of changes, determined on the basis of monitoring. In addition, improved water quality will have a positive impact on the recreational use of this reservoir.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据