4.6 Article

Potential Risk of Agrochemical Leaching in Areas of Edaphoclimatic Suitability for Coffee Cultivation

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14091515

关键词

pesticides; environmental pollution; water pollution; soil pollution; GIS

资金

  1. promoting agency Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. National Institute of Meteorology (INMET)
  4. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the potential risk of pesticide leaching in areas suitable for coffee cultivation in Espirito Santo state, Brazil. The findings demonstrate that sulfentrazone and thiamethoxam pose a potential risk of leaching into groundwater. The use of geographic information system techniques allows for potential risk assessment in other agricultural areas and crops.
Studies show that agricultural activities around the world still present a strong dependence on agrochemicals that can leach into the soil profile, causing its contamination, as well as that of water resources. In this context, the present study evaluates the potential risk of pesticide leaching in areas of edaphoclimatic suitability for coffee cultivation in Espirito Santo state, Brazil. As a methodology, the areas of edaphoclimatic suitability for conilon and arabica coffee were defined, and subsequently, the risk of leaching of active agrochemical ingredients in these areas was evaluated using the Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS), Leaching Index (LIX) and Attenuation Factor/Retardation Factor (AF/RF) methods. Of the ten active ingredients evaluated, sulfentrazone and thiamethoxam present a potential risk of leaching into the groundwater level. The study allowed us to evaluate the potential risk of agrochemical leaching in tropical soils cultivated with coffee using geographic information system (GIS) techniques. The methodological proposal can be adapted for other agricultural areas and crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据