4.7 Article

Antibodies against Anthrax Toxins: A Long Way from Benchlab to the Bedside

期刊

TOXINS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14030172

关键词

antibody; anthrax; biodefense; clinical development; in vivo protection

资金

  1. Direction Generale de l'Armement (DGA) [2010.94.092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the development of an antibody for neutralizing anthrax toxins. The antibody showed promising results in animal experiments but was ultimately cancelled due to industrial and scientific issues. The authors review their strategy, preliminary results, and the challenges faced during the development process.
Anthrax is an acute disease caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, and is a potential biowarfare/bioterrorist agent. Its pulmonary form, caused by inhalation of the spores, is highly lethal and is mainly related to injury caused by the toxins secretion. Antibodies neutralizing the toxins of B. anthracis are regarded as promising therapeutic drugs, and two are already approved by the Federal Drug Administration. We developed a recombinant human-like humanized antibody, 35PA83 6.20, that binds the protective antigen and that neutralized anthrax toxins in-vivo in White New Zealand rabbits infected with the lethal 9602 strain by intranasal route. Considering these promising results, the preclinical and clinical phase one development was funded and a program was started. Unfortunately, after 5 years, the preclinical development was cancelled due to industrial and scientific issues. This shutdown underlined the difficulty particularly, but not only, for an academic laboratory to proceed to clinical development, despite the drug candidate being promising. Here, we review our strategy and some preliminary results, and we discuss the issues that led to the no-go decision of the pre-clinical development of 35PA83 6.20 mAb. Our review provides general information to the laboratories planning a (pre-)clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据