4.7 Article

SAR Image Segmentation by Efficient Fuzzy C-Means Framework with Adaptive Generalized Likelihood Ratio Nonlocal Spatial Information Embedded

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14071621

关键词

image segmentation; synthetic aperture radar (SAR); fuzzy c-means (FCM); speckle noise; non-local means

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existence of multiplicative noise in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images makes SAR segmentation by fuzzy c-means (FCM) a challenging task. To tackle this problem, we propose two unsupervised FCM segmentation frameworks: LBNL_FCM and GLR_FCM. Both frameworks achieve high segmentation accuracy on simulated and real SAR images.
The existence of multiplicative noise in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images makes SAR segmentation by fuzzy c-means (FCM) a challenging task. To cope with speckle noise, we first propose an unsupervised FCM with embedding log-transformed Bayesian non-local spatial information (LBNL_FCM). This non-local information is measured by a modified Bayesian similarity metric which is derived by applying the log-transformed SAR distribution to Bayesian theory. After, we construct the similarity metric of patches as the continued product of corresponding pixel similarity measured by generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) to avoid the undesirable characteristics of log-transformed Bayesian similarity metric. An alternative unsupervised FCM framework named GLR_FCM is then proposed. In both frameworks, an adaptive factor based on the local intensity entropy is employed to balance the original and non-local spatial information. Additionally, the membership degree smoothing and the majority voting idea are integrated as supplementary local information to optimize segmentation. Concerning experiments on simulated SAR images, both frameworks can achieve segmentation accuracy of over 97%. On real SAR images, both unsupervised FCM segmentation frameworks work well on SAR homogeneous segmentation in terms of region consistency and edge preservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据