4.7 Article

Improved Clear Sky Model from In Situ Observations and Spatial Distribution of Aerosol Optical Depth for Satellite-Derived Solar Irradiance over the Korean Peninsula

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14092167

关键词

clear sky model; aerosol optical depth; solar resource assessment; satellite-derived solar irradiance; reanalysis data

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Research [C2-2410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the importance of aerosol optical depth for deriving clear sky irradiance in radiative transfer models and examined its viability in a universal or community model for public use. The results confirm that the clear sky model using gridded datasets of aerosol optical depth is suitable for use as a universal or community model.
In solar resource assessment, the climatological environment of the target area is objectively quantified by the cloudiness or clear sky index, which is defined as the ratio of global horizontal irradiance to clear sky solar insolation. The clear sky model calculates incoming solar irradiance on the ground surface considering several atmospheric parameters such as water vapor and aerosol optical depth. This study investigated the importance of aerosol optical depth for deriving clear sky irradiance in radiative transfer models and examined its viability in a universal or community model for public use. The evaluation was conducted based on ground observations at the Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER) station from January to December 2021. The original simulation was performed using the monthly mean of aerosol optical depth obtained from the Aerosol Robotic Network station; the mean absolute error was 29.9 W m(-2). When the daily mean of in situ observations at KIER was incorporated into the clear sky model, the mean absolute error was reduced to 9.7 W m(-2). Our results confirm that the clear sky model using gridded datasets of aerosol optical depth is suitable for use as a universal or community model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据