4.7 Article

Morphology-Controlled Synthesis of Polyphosphazene-Based Micro- and Nano-Materials and Their Application as Flame Retardants

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14102072

关键词

morphology-controlled; polyphosphazene; nano-materials; flame retardant; PET

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1801502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Common flame retardants, such as halogen-based materials, are being phased-out due to their harmful effects on the environment and health. This study demonstrates that polyphosphazene-based flame retardants, specifically those with capsicum-like nanotube morphology, are effective and environmentally-friendly alternatives. The innovative design and synthesis of morphology-controlled nanomaterials contribute to enhanced flame retardant properties.
Common flame retardants, such as halogen-based materials, are being phased-out owing to their harmful environmental and health effects. We prepared poly-(cyclotriphosphazene-co-4,4 '-sulfonyldiphenol) (PZS) microspheres, nanotubes, capsicum-like nanotubes, and branched nanotubes as flame retardants. An increase in reaction temperature changed the morphology from nanotubes to microspheres. A PZS shape had a positive effect on the flame retardancy of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The PZS with a capsicum-like nanotube morphology had the best flame retardancy, and the PET limiting oxygen index increased from 25.2% to 34.4%. The flame retardancy capability was followed by PZS microspheres (33.1%), branched nanotubes (32.8%), and nanotubes (32.5%). The capsicum-like nanotubes promote the formation of highly dense and continuous carbon layers, and they release a non-combustible gas (CO2). This study confirms polyphosphazene-based flame retardants as viable and environmentally-friendly alternatives to common flame retardants. It also presents a novel and facile design and synthesis of morphology-controlled nanomaterials with enhanced flame retardant properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据