4.7 Article

How Can Ozone and Relative Humidity Affect Artists' Alkyd Paints? A FT-IR and Py-GC/MS Systematic Study

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14091831

关键词

alkyd paints; Py-GC; MS; ozone; relative humidity; degradation behaviour

资金

  1. Municipality of Venice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the degradation behavior of artists' alkyd paints is crucial for their conservation. In this study, surface-level identification and bulk identification of organic compounds in the paints before and after accelerated aging were performed using ATR-FTIR and Py-GC/MS techniques, respectively. The results provide new insights into the degradation behavior of alkyd paints when exposed to ozone, aiding in the development of specific preventive and conservation strategies.
Knowledge of the chemical-physical reactions that determine the main degradation behaviour of artists' alkyd paints represents one of the main problems within the museum exhibitions. The collection and interpretation of these data on degradation phenomena, especially after ozone exposure at different relative humidity values, can be useful for their conservation needs. Therefore, a systematic investigation of these materials may help achieve this goal. Firstly, surface-level identification of the main functional groups of ad hoc created and aged alkyd paints was performed using attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Subsequently, these paints were investigated by pyrolysis-gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), allowing for precise bulk identification of the organic compounds before and after accelerated ageing. A first successful attempt to provide quantitative Py-GC/MS data on alkyd-based paints is here presented and discussed. Comparing the results, it was possible to obtain new insights into the degradation behaviour of alkyd paints when exposed to ozone, allowing us to devise specific preventive and conservation strategies for these artistic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据