4.7 Review

Polymeric Biomass Derived Adsorbents for Co(II) Remediation, Recycling and Analysis

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14091647

关键词

polymeric biomass; biosorption; cobalt; removal; recovery; analysis; real samples

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews and integrates the knowledge on the use of polymeric biomasses as adsorbents for the cleaner separation of cobalt from synthetic and real solutions. The first part discusses the removal performance of these materials, while the second part focuses on their practical applications. The study suggests that the biosorbents have great potential in Co(II) analysis.
The gradual replacement of conventional materials with materials tailored to the green development goals is one of the needs of the day. Correspondingly, this article reviews and integrates, for the first time, the gathered knowledge on the use of the adsorbents based on polymeric biomasses (biosorbents) for a cleaner separation of cobalt (Co) from synthetic and actual solutions. It is a two-part comprehensive approach that debates the Co biosorption potential of bio-based polymers from the perspective of their virtual and real applications for decontamination, recovery, and analytical purposes. First, the removal performances of these materials to batch and fixed column biosorption of Co(II) from mono-component and multi-metallic laboratory solutions are systematized and discussed. Following that, the focus of the first part is shifted to the analytical capabilities of the biosorbents proposed for Co(II) quantification from synthetic solutions. The second section considers the polymeric biomasses successfully incorporated in practical strategies for the removal and recovery of Co(II) from real solutions. The opportunities provided by the use of biosorbents for the development of accurate and greener procedures in Co(II) analysis are also highlighted. The directions in which the research on this topic should be continued and strengthened are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据