4.7 Article

Fracture Toughness of Moldable Low-Temperature Carbonized Elastomer-Based Composites Filled with Shungite and Short Carbon Fibers

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14091793

关键词

composites; rubbers; carbonization; shungite; short carbon fibers; fracture toughness; stress intensity factor; three-point bending test; acoustics; microstructure

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Promotion of Innovation [14908GO/2019]
  2. Ministry of science and higher education of Russia [075-00268-20-02, 47 GP, 718/20, 0718-2020-0036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the fracture toughness of low-temperature carbonized elastomer-based composites filled with shungite and short carbon fibers. The results showed that the increase in carbonization temperature resulted in a decrease in the critical stress intensity factor, while the addition of carbon fibers enhanced the toughness of the material.
This work evaluated the fracture toughness of the low-temperature carbonized elastomer-based composites filled with shungite and short carbon fibers. The effects of the carbonization temperature and filler content on the critical stress intensity factor (K-1c) were examined. The K-1c parameter was obtained using three-point bending tests for specimens with different l/b ratio (notch depth to sample thickness) ranging from 0.2 to 0.4. Reliable detection of the initiation and propagation of cracks was achieved using an acoustic sensor was attached to the samples during the bending test. The critical stress intensity factor was found to decrease linearly with increasing carbonization temperature. As the temperature increased from 280 to 380 degrees C, the K-1c parameter was drastically reduced from about 5 to 1 MPa center dot m(1/2) and was associated with intense outgassing during the carbonization step that resulted in sample porosity. The carbon fiber addition led to some incremental toughening; however, it reduced the statistical dispersion of the K-1c values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据