4.7 Article

Hybridization Effect on Mechanical Properties of Basalt/Kevlar/Epoxy Composite Laminates

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14071382

关键词

hybrid laminate; basalt; kevlar; mechanical analysis; morphological analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the fabrication and mechanical properties of Kevlar/epoxy, basalt/epoxy, and Kevlar/basalt/epoxy hybrid composite laminates. The results showed that the pure basalt/epoxy laminates exhibited higher tensile and flexural strength compared to its Kevlar/epoxy counterpart, while the hybrid laminates showed intermediate values. Similar trends were observed in terms of hardness and impact strength.
The present work investigates the fabrication of Kevlar/epoxy and basalt/epoxy and Kevlar/basalt/epoxy hybrid composite laminates and compares their mechanical properties. Mechanical characterization tests, including tension, flexural, impact and hardness tests, as per ASTM standards, were conducted on coupons cut out from the fabricated composite panels. A hand layup fabrication technique was used to fabricate composite panels with seven layers in them. Eight such laminates, with two containing pure Kevlar/epoxy and basalt/epoxy and the remaining ones containing Kevlar/basalt, were stacked in different sequences and impregnated in an epoxy matrix to provide a hybrid configuration. The microscopic examination of the fabricated laminates revealed that there was good bonding between the reinforcements and matrix material. Out of the eight composite panels including the hybrids, the ones with the pure basalt/epoxy exhibited more tensile and flexural strength than its Kevlar/epoxy counterpart due to its higher density value. The tensile and flexural strength of the hybrid laminates (i.e., combinations of basalt/Kevlar/epoxy) showed values in between pure basalt/epoxy and Kevlar/epoxy laminates in general. A similar trend was observed in terms of hardness and impact strength for the fabricated composite laminates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据