4.7 Article

Vertical Alignment of Liquid Crystals on Phenylphenoxymethyl-Substituted Polystyrene-PS Derivatives Structurally Similar to LC Molecules

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14050934

关键词

liquid crystal; precursor; alignment layer; polystyrene; 4-phenylphenol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of polymer films with similar liquid crystal molecular structure on liquid crystal alignment properties was examined using modified polystyrene derivatives, resulting in different alignments depending on the chemical structure of the derivatives. Vertical liquid crystal alignment was found to be associated with the polar surface energy of the films.
A series of polystyrene derivatives containing precursors of liquid crystal (LC) molecules, phenylphenoxymethyl-substituted polystyrene (PPHE#; # = 5, 15, 25, 50, 75, and 100)-where # is the molar content of 4-phenylphenol using polymer modification reactions-were prepared in order to examine the effect of the polymer film, which possess similar LC molecular structure on the LC alignment properties. It was found that the T-g values of the PPHE# were higher than 100 degrees C due to their aromatic structure in the biphenyl-based PHE moiety. The LC cells fabricated with PPHE5 and PPHE15 films exhibited planar LC alignment. Conversely, LC molecules showed a vertical alignment in LC cells made using the polymer films with phenylphenoxymethyl side groups in the range of 25-100 mol %. The polar surface energies on the PPHE# films can be associated with the vertical LC alignment on the PPHE# films. For example, vertical LC alignment was exhibited when the polar surface energy of the polymer films was less than approximately 4.2 mJ/m(2). Aligning stability was observed at 200 degrees C and UV irradiation of 20 J/cm(2) for LC cells made using the PPHE100 film. Therefore, it was found that biphenyl, one of the LC precursors, modified polystyrene derivatives and can produce a next-generation vertical LC alignment system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据