4.7 Article

Encapsulation of β-Carotene in Oil-in-Water Emulsions Containing Nanocellulose: Impact on Emulsion Properties, In Vitro Digestion, and Bioaccessibility

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14071414

关键词

encapsulation; beta-carotene; emulsion; nanocellulose; fat digestion

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  2. Office of the Higher Education Commission (OHEC) [MRG 6280236]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the influence of nanocellulose type and concentrations on the properties and bioaccessibility of emulsions. The results showed that stable beta-carotene loaded emulsions were formed when NCC was used as a stabilizer at a concentration of 0.2% w/w. In contrast, increasing concentrations of NFC emulsions resulted in reduced release of fatty acids and lower bioavailability of beta-carotene.
The objective of this study was to explore the influence of nanocellulose type (nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) and nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC)) and concentrations (0.05-0.20%, w/w) on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, and in vitro digestion of beta-carotene loaded emulsions and beta-carotene bioaccessibility. The optimum conditions for the formation of stable beta-carotene loaded emulsions were found when NCC was used as a stabilizer at a concentration of 0.2% w/w. This was due to the rod-shaped structure of NCC, which led to more stable emulsions with smaller droplet size and reduced flocculation. During the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, NFC emulsions at increased concentrations were found to retard free fatty acid (FFA) release from the emulsions and reduce the bioaccessibility of beta-carotene. On the other hand, NCC emulsions at concentrations of 0.2% w/w promoted lipolysis and demonstrated highest beta-carotene bioavailability. Hence, these emulsions could be used for the delivery of beta-carotene with potential applications in the development of functional foods and nutraceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据