4.7 Article

Isotype Heterojunction-Boosted CO2 Photoreduction to CO

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00821-9

关键词

Isotype heterojunction; g-C3N4; CO2 photoreduction; Charge dynamics; Reaction mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12047564, 52071041, 12074048]
  2. Project for Fundamental and Frontier Research in Chongqing [cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0777, cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0796]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [cqu2018CDHB1A09, 106112016CDJZR308808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to high-value products is crucial for achieving a carbon-neutral economy. Isotype heterojunctions, such as the one formed by g-C3N4, have been found to have significantly higher efficiency in spatial separation and transfer of photogenerated carriers compared to single components. This enhanced charge dynamics promotes the production of key intermediates and improves the overall reaction kinetics.
Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to high-value products plays a crucial role in the global pursuit of carbon-neutral economy. Junction photocatalysts, such as the isotype heterojunctions, offer an ideal paradigm to navigate the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CRR). Herein, we elucidate the behaviors of isotype heterojunctions toward photocatalytic CRR over a representative photocatalyst, g-C3N4. Impressively, the isotype heterojunctions possess a significantly higher efficiency for the spatial separation and transfer of photogenerated carriers than the single components. Along with the intrinsically outstanding stability, the isotype heterojunctions exhibit an exceptional and stable activity toward the CO2 photoreduction to CO. More importantly, by combining quantitative in situ technique with the first-principles modeling, we elucidate that the enhanced photoinduced charge dynamics promotes the production of key intermediates and thus the whole reaction kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据