4.6 Article

S-Palmitoylation of a Novel Site in the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Associated with a Novel Intracellular Itinerary

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 291, 期 38, 页码 20232-20246

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.725762

关键词

adrenergic receptor; G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); membrane trafficking; protein palmitoylation; receptor desensitization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01HL075443]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K18988] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here that a population of human (2)-adrenergic receptors ((2)AR), a canonical G protein-coupled receptor, traffics along a previously undescribed intracellular itinerary via the Golgi complex that is associated with the sequential S-palmitoylation and depalmitoylation of a previously undescribed site of modification, Cys-265 within the third intracellular loop. Basal S-palmitoylation of Cys-265 is negligible, but agonist-induced (2)AR activation results in enhanced S-palmitoylation, which requires phosphorylation by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase of Ser-261/Ser-262. Agonist-induced turnover of palmitate occurs predominantly on Cys-265. Cys-265 S-palmitoylation is mediated by the Golgi-resident palmitoyl transferases zDHHC9/14/18 and is followed by depalmitoylation by the plasma membrane-localized acyl-protein thioesterase APT1. Inhibition of depalmitoylation reveals that S-palmitoylation of Cys-265 may stabilize the receptor at the plasma membrane. In addition, (2)AR S-palmitoylated at Cys-265 are selectively preserved under a sustained adrenergic stimulation, which results in the down-regulation and degradation of AR. Cys-265 is not conserved in (1)AR, and S-palmitoylation of Cys-265 may thus be associated with functional differences between (2)AR and (1)AR, including relative resistance of (2)AR to down-regulation in multiple pathophysiologies. Trafficking via the Golgi complex may underlie new roles in G protein-coupled receptor biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据