4.5 Article

Advances in the development of superhydrophobic and icephobic surfaces

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10999-022-09593-x

关键词

Superhydrophobicity; Icephobicity; Wettability; Nanocomposites; Anti-icing; Antiviral

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [RGPIN-2018-03804]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review explores the development of superhydrophobic and icephobic surfaces and their significance in practical applications. It discusses the fundamentals of wetting phenomenon and the response of superhydrophobic surfaces to droplet contact and impingement, with a focus on the use of nanocomposites. The review also highlights the advances in icephobicity and its relation to superhydrophobicity, as well as the importance of using superhydrophobic surfaces to combat viral and bacterial contamination on surfaces.
Superhydrophobicity and icephobicity are governed by surface chemistry and surface structure. These two features signify a potential advance in surface engineering and have recently garnered significant attention from the research community. This review aims to simulate further research in the development of superhydrophobic and icephobic surfaces in order to achieve their wide-spread adoption in practical applications. The review begins by establishing the fundamentals of the wetting phenomenon and wettability parameters. This is followed by the recent advances in modeling and simulations of the response of superhydrophobic surfaces to static and dynamic droplets contact and impingement, respectively. In view of their versatility and multifunctionality, a special attention is given to the development of these surfaces using nanocomposites. Furthermore, the review considers advances in icephobicity, its comprehensive characterization and its relation to superhydrophobicity. The review also includes the importance of the use of superhydrophobic surface to combat viral and bacterial contamination that exist in fomites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据