4.3 Article

Rapid, Sensitive On-Site Detection of Deoxynivalenol in Cereals Using Portable and Reusable Evanescent Wave Optofluidic Immunosensor

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073759

关键词

deoxynivalenol; evanescent wave; immunosensor; optofluidic; food detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675171]
  2. National Instrument Major Project of China [2012YQ3011105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an improved portable and reusable evanescent wave optofluidic immunosensor (OIP-v2) for rapid and sensitive on-site determination of deoxynivalenol (DON), a frequently detected mycotoxin produced by Fusarium species. The OIP-v2 showed a high limit of detection and linear dynamic detection range under optimal conditions. It also demonstrated good correlation with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when detecting maize-positive samples.
This paper develops an improved portable and reusable evanescent wave optofluidic immunosensor (OIP-v2) for rapid and sensitive on-site determination of deoxynivalenol (DON), one of the most frequently detected mycotoxins mainly produced by Fusarium species. Using the bifunctional reagent N,N '-Disuccinimidyl carbonate, deoxynivalenol-bovine-serum-albumin (DON-BSA) were covalently modified onto a bio-probe surface as biorecognition elements, whose robustness allowed it to perform multiple detections without significant activity loss. An indirect competitive immunoassay strategy was applied for DON detection. Under optimal conditions, the limit of detection of 0.11 mu g/L and the linear dynamic detection range of 0.43 to 36.61 mu g/L was obtained when the concentration of the Cy5.5-anti-DON antibody was 0.25 mu g/mL. The OIP-v2 was also applied to detect DON in various cereals, and the recoveries ranged from 81% to 127%. The correlation between OIP-v2 and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) through the simultaneous detection of maize-positive samples was in good agreement (R-2 = 0.9891).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据